Anonymous Reviews: Teachers, the Best and the Worst
From professors who ignite a passion for learning to classes that redefine academic excellence, and yes, even those that leave us questioning our life choices – get ready for an honest and anonymous exploration of the diverse array of teaching and learning experiences at UO. Strap in as we unveil the untold stories, share the triumphs, and expose the challenges that make up the academic tapestry of our university. Welcome to the anonymous confessional of student reviews, where no grade is too sacred, and no syllabus is left unscrutinized.
academic Heartthrobs
Native American Lit - ENG 244
Intro to Native American Literature is a four-credit course that provides a comprehensive exploration of Native American literature and culture within relevant intellectual, social, and historical contexts. This course is an excellent option for students looking to fulfill either a group 3 requirement or a multicultural perspectives requirement. Delving into the rich tapestry of Native American literary traditions, the class not only offers valuable insights into the diverse cultures and histories of Indigenous peoples but also provides a unique lens through which students can critically engage with various literary works. Highly recommended by fellow students on campus, ENG 244 promises to be a rewarding academic journey that fosters a deeper understanding of Native American perspectives and narratives.
Choquette - PPPM
This professor truly stands out among the faculty at UO, with student remarking that his teaching style made them “excited to go to class” and that he is one of the best professors they have ever had! Big claims that Choquette seems to back up, definitely worth taking a class with him this spring.
Dr. Cortez - ENG/WR
Dr Gupta - CHEM
Professor Sanchez - Anth 145
Professor Gildea - Ling 101
DR. Hatay - WR 122
Recently “Dr. H” received glowing revies from our anonymous survey with students glowing about the instruction they received during her Writing 122 class, a general education credit. This is a great choice for lowerclassmen trying to finish their WR credits!
Professor Pendleton
Professor Pendleton is a beloved philosophy teacher here at university of Oregon, he comes highly recommended and, if you can, you should take a class with him to expand your mind and your GPA.
“Most underrated professor is Ken Pendleton. That man is a fucking angel of a human” -Yikyaker 2/19
Pendleton’s exceptional review does end with yikyak comments. He has a 4.9/5 on rate my professor and 100% of students surveyed said they “would take again.”
CH331 - Glass
CH 331, "Organic Chemistry I," led by Adam Glass, receives glowing praise from students. With a perfect 5/5 rating on Rate My Professor and an impressive 98% of students expressing their desire to take another course with Glass, this class promises an engaging and enriching learning experience in the study of organic molecules.
PSY202 - Chavez
“LOVE ROB” commented one yikyaker
Praise resounds for PSY 202, "Mind and Society," under the instruction of Rob Chavez, according to a recent anonymous YikYak post. The student expresses profound admiration, stating, "LOVE ROB CHAVEZ psy202."
PSY 202, a 4-credit course, introduces students to clinical, personality, social, and developmental psychology. Rob Chavez, the instructor, garners an impressive 4.5 out of 5 on Rate My Professor, with an outstanding 92% of surveyed students expressing their intent to take another course with him.
This positive review serves as an endorsement for both the course content and Rob Chavez's teaching approach. As students contemplate their upcoming term, this resounding praise offers a clear and compelling recommendation for those intrigued by the fascinating intersections of the human mind and society in PSY 202.
BA240 - Ford
ANTH220
As we approach the conclusion of winter term and students begin to strategize their course selections for the upcoming spring semester, it's paramount to identify classes that not only fulfill academic requirements but also ignite intellectual curiosity. An insightful anonymous review from a fellow University of Oregon student sheds light on two standout courses that deserve a closer look as we plan our schedules.
First on the list is BA 240: Spreadsheet Analysis and Visualization, a four-credit course tailored to data enthusiasts. Specifically with Professor Erik Ford. This class offers a data-oriented approach to structuring and analyzing information, particularly emphasizing its applications in traditional business functions. From modern techniques for developing fact-based decision models to practical insights into data visualization, BA 240 appears to be a promising option for students interested in sharpening their analytical skills within a business context.
Additionally, ANTH 220: Introduction to Nutritional Anthropology emerges as a compelling course worth considering. With a focus on human nutrition from a biocultural anthropological lens, this four-credit offering delves into the intricate relationship between food consumption patterns and evolution. Moreover, it explores contemporary issues surrounding malnutrition and diseases of nutrition, providing a holistic understanding of nutritional challenges within human societies.
This review serves as a valuable reminder to students to explore beyond the conventional course catalog and seek out classes that offer unique perspectives and engaging content. Whether your interests lie in data analysis and decision-making or in the intersection of biology and culture through the lens of nutrition, these courses present opportunities for intellectual growth and academic enrichment.
As we navigate the process of selecting classes for the upcoming term, let's heed the advice of our peers and remain open to discovering new academic passions. By embracing diversity in our course selections, we can cultivate a well-rounded educational experience that prepares us for success both inside and outside the classroom at the University of Oregon. Happy scheduling, Ducks!
SOC457
J371
J461
In the ongoing quest classes that don’t suck, a recent YikYak review has cast a spotlight on the Sociology department, providing valuable insights for students poised to make crucial decisions about their spring class schedules. This candid revelation comes as a beacon for those seeking courses within the sociology realm, with one student endorsing SOC 457 as their personal favorite among the available options.
SOC 457, titled "Sex and Society," emerges as a standout course, promising an exploration of alternative sociological perspectives on sexual behavior, the social construction and regulation of sexuality, and contemporary social and political issues related to this intricate facet of human life. However, it's crucial to note that successful enrollment requires a prerequisite completion of SOC 310.
Further guidance from the same student extends to Journalism courses, but with a note of caution. While SOC classes garnered praise, the YikYak contributor underscores the varied student experiences within journalism coursework, urging their peers to exercise discernment as they navigate the selection process for the upcoming term.
Specifically, the student highlights J 461, "Newspaper Editing," and J 371, "Feature Writing I," as additional favorites within the Journalism program. J 461 delves into the intricacies of copyediting, headline writing, and page design for newspapers in both print and online formats, emphasizing grammar and style. Meanwhile, J 371 serves as an introduction to feature writing for print and online media, with a focus on marketing ideas and stories. It's imperative to note that these journalism courses have prerequisites: J 461 requires successful completion of J 211, J 212, J 213, and J 361 with a grade better than C-, while J 371 necessitates completion of J 213 and J 361 with a grade better than C-.
As we approach the spring scheduling period, let this YikYak review be a valuable guidepost, steering students toward Sociology classes with a special nod to SOC 457, while offering a cautious reminder to approach Journalism courses with a discerning eye. The academic journey is a nuanced one, and each course selection plays a pivotal role in shaping our educational experience. May this insight contribute to a thoughtful and informed decision-making process for all students at our esteemed institution.
Haters gonna hate?
Professor Cepek - MTH
One student warned “don’t take anything” from this professor in the math department. However, rate my professor tells a more complicated story where Cepek receives a 3.1/5 and 75% of student surveyed said they would take again. Seems like her teaching style might be hit or miss so maybe steer clear this spring!
CLAS201 - Eckerman
“Fuck that doof ass prof” - yikyaker 2/19
ASTR121 - Schombert
A blunt and negative sentiment surfaces on YikYak about ASTR 121, "The Solar System," with the succinct comment, "Fuck ASTR121 with James Schombert." This discontented student opinion warns peers of potential challenges in the course led by James Schombert, who holds a concerning 2.4/5 rating on Rate My Professor. Only 20% of surveyed students express a willingness to take another course under his instruction. As students consider their options for the upcoming term, this candid review urges caution and suggests exploring alternative courses within the discipline.
MUS267 - Kruckenberg
In this edition of Anonymous Reviews, we've uncovered a vocal expression of discontent from a student who boldly declares, "Fuck Kruckenberg, all my homies HATE Kruckenberg." The student spares no words in conveying their dissatisfaction with the MUS267 class, shining a spotlight on the instructor, Kruckenberg.
The anonymous reviewer doesn't hold back, providing a concise yet powerful critique of their negative experience. While the specifics of the grievances are not detailed, the intensity of the sentiment suggests a substantial level of discontent with both the course and the teacher.
Professor Lori Kruckenberg has earned a less-than-stellar reputation among her students. According to Rate My Professor, Kruckenberg boasts a lukewarm 2.5/5 rating, but the real eye-opener is the staggering 0% of students who claimed they "would take again." This revelation adds weight to the anonymous student's frustration, as it seems they are not alone in their dissatisfaction.
To put it into perspective, we found that Kruckenberg has not received a positive anonymous student review on Rate My Professor since 2013. This lengthy stretch of discontent raises questions about the consistency of the teaching experience in MUS267 and highlights the potential challenges students may face under Kruckenberg's instruction.
In this candid glimpse into the student perspective, it's evident that MUS267, under the guidance of Kruckenberg, has left a lasting impression – but not necessarily a positive one. As we continue to unravel the anonymous narratives of university life, this review serves as a stark reminder that the academic journey can be a symphony of highs and lows, with instructors playing a pivotal role in shaping the overall melody of the student experience. Stay tuned as we uncover more candid reflections on the educators and courses that leave a lasting impact on UO students.
Soultions Journalism
Media Law
Yet another update arrives to warn students of academic fuckery, a YikYak contributor has stepped forward to share a candid opinion on specific courses, sending a cautionary signal to their peers about what they deem as potential pitfalls in the academic journey.
The raw and unapologetic declaration surfaces as one student declares their disdain for "solutions journalism and media law." The use of the word "HATED" resonates with a depth of emotion, suggesting an experience that transcends mere academic dissatisfaction. This vivid choice of language serves as a red flag for fellow students, signaling a potential minefield of challenges within these particular courses.
As we dissect this anonymous declaration, it raises intriguing questions about the nature of these classes. What aspects of solutions journalism and media law have elicited such a visceral response? Is it the content, the teaching style, or perhaps a combination of factors that has led to this vehement expression of discontent?
This revelation serves as a reminder that the academic landscape is diverse, and individual experiences can greatly vary. What one student loathes might be another student's passion. As we navigate the academic terrain, let this candid disclosure be a call to action, prompting students to approach course selections with discernment and a keen awareness of personal preferences and learning styles.